Thursday, January 10, 2013

Sacramento’s Indivisible collective tackles the money problem in the black community



September 17, Indivisible Meeting

In February of 2011, Kevin Johnson was in the second part of his first term as the first black mayor of Sacramento.  This is a time when politicians often ask their political advisors questions about their prospects for re-election or seeking higher office.  Instead, Mayor Johnson asked an uncomfortable question about his effectiveness, not of his advisors, but of his constituency.   That question he posed to black Sacramentans was this: Is your life any better because I’m the mayor?  The answer—by and large—was a resounding “no”.  And so, the Indivisible collective was born.  Started as a few concerned citizens, the group grew to now over 200 monthly attendees dedicated to providing a presence (manpower) and buy in (financial backing) to issues related to improving the overall status of black Sacramentans. 

The framework Indivisible employed to organize itself was to amass people and resources to address three primary issues: Education, Economics and Politics.  For almost two years, the monthly meetings involved a community speaker, the mayor’s address, and some updates on two related groups, STAND UP and PAC Fifteen.  STAND UP is an education nonprofit working for teacher quality, accountability, school choice, parent engagement and effective policy and PAC Fifteen is a super political action committee dedicated to raising funds to support the campaigns of candidates for public service that will represent the best interests of the black community.    By most standards, the collective was impressively successful in such a short time.  STAND UP launched the Sacramento Reads program to improve elementary school literacy and the Freedom Writer’s Institute.  PAC Fifteen raised $50,000, thanks to a pro bono fundraiser with Roland Martin in May 2012, the money from which was helpful in getting Allen Wayne Warren elected to Sacramento City Council in District 2. 

As a product of Sacramento’s Oak Park community, this cause is very personal for Mayor Johnson.  However, he’s been careful not to alienate important supporters outside of the black community.  He constantly reminds Indivisible of our important allies and that being “pro black” does not mean being “anti-anyone else,” but that we need to change the trend that black people are “in last place for [indicators that measure] everything good and first place for everything bad.”  I can quote him on this because it is a staple part of his monthly address.  And, herein lies the inevitable critique; while the point cannot be reiterated enough, over time as I looked at the faces of the audience members, it began to feel as if he was preaching redemption to the converted, specifically those attending their fourth service of the day because they also sing in the choir. 

Month after month a growing number of community members attended the meetings and brought new people with them.  In fact, by September 2012, almost 700 people had attended at least one Indivisible meeting.   However, the group had difficulty month after month reaching the Mayor’s goal of having 200 people fill The Guild Theatre in Oak Park during the monthly meetings.  Part of the waning enthusiasm was that the details about how Indivisible was going to address the three priority areas seemed to lack direction.   The goal of simply “showing up” was not enough to keep a largely professional crowd coming each month, despite their high hopes for the ambitious Mayor and his newly formed group.  And so, the chorus of voices began to say, “I’m on the email list and I’ll come back when there’s something for me to do.” 

Coincidentally, after a few meetings with lower attendance than previously recorded, renewed enthusiasm for the group began when Indivisible sponsored a private viewing of “Won’t Back Down” in October.  Needless to say, a very spirited public conversation took place after the movie surrounding its controversial theme: the (false) dichotomy that teacher interests (read: unions) and child interests (read: achievement) are inherently at odds.  Despite a groundswell of interest in education, another key area began to have a little more weight in the mayor’s monthly address: economics.  Beginning with sharing the Urban League state of black America in the late summer, Mayor Johnson began to share information about generational poverty and generational wealth, the spending power of the black community, and the need for the restoration of community trust to make a collective impact.   And so, on December 17, he invited Melody Hobson, 43, President of Ariel Investments and newly appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors for DreamWorks, to speak on this topic.

To say her remarks were epic is an understatement.  Her rags to riches story inspires a naïve belief in the American Dream…. and possibly even Santa Claus, because if this woman can achieve the success she has, there’s nothing that anyone with willpower can’t do.  But therein lies the point, I think.  It actually isn’t magic.  Nor is it luck or happenstance.  Her story is remarkable in how much it relies on basic common sense and everyday experience.  A good example of this is illustrated in the story of the impetus for her life’s work.  Watching her mother squander money on unimportant things like Easter dresses when the light bill hadn’t been paid, made Melody determined to make different decisions and understand how money works.  Or, stated how your mother would say it, she learned early on that “doing the same thing (we’ve) always done gets us the same thing (we’ve) always gotten.”

Melody’s remarks were part inspirational speaker, part sister-friend, and part financial guru, precisely the thing that we need to cultivate in our community.  Her remarks taught the value of investing, especially in industries you know well, because your familiarity and expertise makes the process more personable and understandable. 

She had a special message to the women about the confidence of our voices. She spoke to the women about being unafraid to be irreverent and admonishing for asking for permission and undermining our own credibility by being afraid to speak first. Most importantly though, she reflected on a great quote by Judith Collins, “As women we’re raised to have rescue fantasies, but I’m here to tell you: no one is coming.”  Melody shared this quote in a women’s only reception before the Indivisible meeting, so the mayor made the men say, “We’re coming” at the beginning of the meeting without understanding the context!  Though we all got a kick out of the “response” without the “call”, she later expanded this comment not just to the women, but to the entire black community.  “We need to behave as if no one is coming because they’re not.  It is up to us to be able to leave an inheritance for our grandchildren.”  To that end she gave five reasons that the black community is underappreciating financial opportunities: 1) lack of knowledge, 2) misinformation, 3) lack of trust, 4) lack of exposure, and 5) financial conservatism.  The latter term she defined as the shortsightedness of taking extremely conservative risks which result in the black community unwittingly sacrificing wealth. 

Polling audience members in the packed house at The Guild, people left feeling inspired and empowered.  It was a great launch event for a stronger focus on economics in 2013.  After the meeting, David DeLuz, President of the Greater Sacramento Urban League, said he was impressed with Melody and the direction that Indivisible is taking as the mayor continues to unfold the plan of action for 2013. The Indivisible vision is in alignment with the work the Urban League is already doing to help providing housing and financial education.   “I just want to encourage people to attend the meetings. I think it's important, and it gives us an opportunity not only to set the agenda, but also act upon it. Indivisible lets us focus on a few basic things, and get them done. It gives us a place to learn, act, and evaluate our impact.”  

The next Indivisible meeting takes place Monday, January 28 from 6:00 - 7:30 p.m. at the Guild Theatre, 2828 35th Street, Sacramento.

-Flojaune Griffin

3 comments:

  1. Cheers Flo for continuing to attend and be excited about Indivisible. Melody's comment about "stop waiting to be rescued" is so important for both family wealth and the community as a whole. We have to work hard for our families because only we can create the wealth that our families can enjoy and build upon long after we're gone. So too is it our responsibility to build and develop ourselves because the we cannot continue to rely on government assistance when it's unnecessary. It's become such a crutch that the only time we engage the government is when benefits are being taken away, when jobs are not being handed to us, when government isn't breaking us out of jail. Obama's message about this same topic became so lost in a rant about "what he hasn't done for us" when we have to be careful about the choices we make to place in those situations. At some point, "the man" is no longer the problem, it's us. And at some point, the man is going to stop riding in on his white horse (pun intended) to rescue us. It's time for us to behave as if "no one is coming" and save ourselves!!!! Other ethnic minorities have joined in solidarity, now speak in one collective voice and have garnered so much political will that wide sweeping national elections and laws will be focused primarily on gaining support and favor from the latino community. I only hope we haven't missed our chance.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wonderful article on Indivisible Flo. One minor change, the meetings begin at 6pm and end at 7:30pm. I hope to see all who have read this great article there on the 28th of January.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Camille! I need to talk community issues with you more often. I'm missing numerous opportunities to cull your beauiful mind.

    I somewhat disagree about the interpretation of "stop waiting to be rescued." As the person who brought up the "what have you done (SPECIFICALLY--emphasis on specifically) for me lately" topic at the Pizza and Politics, I'd like to clarify my position on this minor criticism. I can't guarantee that my view is the same as others who may have made a similar statement. Obama has done great work on a number of issues I care deeply about (repealing DADT, coming out for gay marriage, the patient protection and affordable care act, preventive services for women, Detroit auto bailout, repealing the global gag rule, the national prevention strategy, and most recently gun reform--I could go on) and I think he is a fantastic President. His accomplishments have helped all Americans and most certainly helped black people. But--and this is an important but-- we do have some unique needs that have not been addressed. Expecting politicians you voted for to respond to needs within your community is not the same as waiting to be rescued. In fact, I would argue that is precisely the opposite of waiting to be rescued. It shows both a respect for the existing infrastructure and a political will to make change. Honoring Obama with 95%+ of the vote in the black community SHOULD come with some work that is directed at our community needs. If I go to Underground Books in Oak Park and pay Mother Rose $40, I want a book or two! And no one would begrudge me in the least if I complained about NOT getting a book after giving her $40! (<-- Gratuitous plug for black-owned business.) We don't vote for politicians so they can be figureheads. We vote for them to represent our interests. Where I will agree with you, Camille, is that we lack effective collaboration. The FIRST thing our black organizations should have done in 2009 was to assemble (Urban League, NAACP, 100 Black Men/Women, Links, NPHC, Sister Song, Churches, etc) and agreed on 2-3 things we wanted out of the next (4-8) years and we should have shared that collective vision with Obama and the Congressional Black Caucus. It is hard to respond to a proposal that is never written. I do blame us, myself included, for that. However, I would argue that if someone is entrusted as a public servant, they do have the responsibility to request input from their constituency to inform their legislative actions. Obama held the infamous "beer summit" on race relations. Honestly, how hard would it have been to request a collective agenda from the national black organizations? He's a community organizer for goodness sake! Maybe my expectations were too high. Or maybe I'm so deeply trained in community-based approaches to public health, that it seems obvious that the first thing you do to help anyone is ask how you can be helpful.

    To be clear, I am a firm Obama supporter. I think that unwavering financial and political support gives me capital and credibility to provide a thoughtful and fair performance evaluation with some suggestions for improvement. And, as with other Presidents I've supported and those I haven't, I've been vocal about their strengths (e.g. Bush did great HIV work in Sub-Saharan Africa) and weaknesses (e.g. Clinton's welfare reform was a disaster). For Obama, I also have some disappointments (including the Plan B politics over science disaster). His lack of attention to black issues happens to be one of them. I'm excited to see what the next 4 years bring.

    ReplyDelete

Please keep your comments respectful. Also note that your comments are monitored and can be removed at any time.